Manuals and instructions for everything

why is thymine replaced by uracil in rna

Regardless of the question of which came first*, RNA or DNA, it is possible to rationalize the absence of thymine in RNA by a costbenefit analysis. There is a cost to using thymine, so there must be sufficient benefits to make this worth while. Cost of using thymine rather than uracil The most obvious cost of using thymine is the energy requirement for its synthesis (in terms of reducing power NADPH). An analogous conversion of rUMP to rTMP (if it existed) would incur similar costs. (There may be additional costs, but they may be contentious and this is indisputable, so it will suffice. )
Benefit of using thymine rather than uracil For DNA the benefit is clear and stated in the question. By not using uracil as the complement to adenine, uracil produced by spontaneous deamination of cytosine can be recognized as abberant and removed by the. This presumably gives the organism an advantage (benefit) by reducing harmful mutations to DNA the genetic material. RNA is not the genetic material of contemporary autonomous organisms. Hence unrepaired C to U deaminations will not affect that aspect of the viability of an organism. How serious will they be for the cell, though? The largest and most long-lived RNAs are the structural ribosomal RNAs. Such mutations in the cells rRNA might have no effect on ribosome function as much of the RNA is thought to be structural. However, even if they did, the inactivation of a small percentage of the ribosomes of a cell would have little impact on protein synthesis. Likewise for the small tRNA molecules. Messenger RNA poses a different problem as we can conclude that abberant proteins made from mutant mRNA are dangerous to the cell from the fact that a exists to correct errors in the charging (aminoacylation) of tRNAs. I would argue that the relatively short half-life of mRNA compared with the frequency of deamination of cytosine means that the latter process is not responsible for a significant amount of mutant mRNA. Conclusion The benefits of using thymine together with a repair system in RNA would be marginal, and hence not worth the energetic cost this would entail.

Footnote: We dont need to argue about which nucleic acid came first The current metabolic pathways for formation of dTTP from dUTP and the reduction of ribose to deoxyribose are strongly suggestive to me that RNA preceeded DNA in evolution. (They suggest nothing about whether RNA preceeded protein. ) However, the rationalization presented here does not require this assumption. If DNA came first and RNA initially had T instead of U, the rationale could be used to argue why RNA changed bases from T to U. Indeed, the rationale can be employed by those who do not even believe in evolution they could argue (and probably do) that some deity created things that way because it was more efficient in terms of costbenefit. The Science Teacher : Why did mother nature use uracil to replace thymine in mRNA (messenger ribonucleic acid)? What is the advantage of using U instead of T in the RNA? Greg A. Freyer, Ph. D. , and Michael Sturr Why did mother nature use uracil to replace thymine in mRNA (messenger ribonucleic acid)? What is the advantage of using U instead of T in the RNA? Al Frisby, Biology Teacher, Liberty High School, Liberty, MO From the Editors: This is a good question, an interesting extension of Paleogenetics, the study of ancient DNA. Here we wonder not just what the genetic encoding looked like, but how it came to be. A better question may be: Why does thymine replace uracil in DNA? Since it takes energy to convert uracil to thymine (by adding a methyl group), why do cells expend the energy required to methylate uracil to thymine for use in DNA? One reason is to protect the DNA. Methylation of bases protects the DNA by making it unrecognizable to many nucleasesenzymes that can break down DNAand thus defending it from attack by invaders like bacteria and viruses.

Since RNA is shorter-lived than DNA, it can get by with the energetically cheaper uracil. Also, adding the hydrophobic methyl group changes the shape of the DNA molecule and allows thymine to base-pair only with adenine, whereas uracil would base-pair less selectively. Finally, using thymine allows more effective recognition and repair of potentially harmful cytosine to uracil mutations, as explained by Dr. Greg Freyer. In DNA, cytosine is readily deaminated, forming uracil. This occurs at a rate of 1,000 to 10,000 times per cell per day. This altered base is recognized very efficiently by uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG), which cleaves it creating an abasic site. This site is then removed and replaced by cytosine, restoring the DNA back to its originaland correctsequence. This process of repair is referred to as base excision repair (BER) and is probably the major system responsible for maintaining the integrity of the cells DNA. For example, BER is responsible for repairing abasic sites, some types of DNA damage caused by UV light (a physical carcinogen), and many other types of DNA damage (e. g. , chemical carcinogens such as benzene; or biological carcinogens such as the HIV virus). If uracil were present in DNA, then the cell would have a difficult time deciding whether the uracil generated from a mutationthe deamination of cytosineshould be there or not. If uracil were used instead of thymine, then the cell would have no logical way of readily distinguishing legitimate uracil from uracil produced by the mutation of cytosine, and thus knowing which uracil base to repair and which to leave alone.

By using thymine in DNA this issue is avoided. Again, RNA uses the cheaper uracil since these C to U mutations are not as harmful in RNA, because it is shorter-lived and synthesized in greater quantities compared to DNA. This explanation, while not a fact or certaintly, is sensible and well regarded. This answer is from Greg A. Freyer, Ph. D. , Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology Columbia University, New York, NY Another Expert Responds: While it may not be known as scientific fact that this was a substitution per se, as opposed to a divergence, the difference, as with so many manifestations of evolution, likely arose from a random genetic mutation in mRNA that led to a molecular structure with equal or greater advantageousness. The uracil probably exists for a couple reasons at the molecular level as a result of enzymatic recognition. The first is that uracil was recognized better by the primordial RNA polymerase enzyme-like protein, and that stuck through the emergence of cells and evolution to current RNA polymerases. A second possibility is that RNA polymerase evolved to prefer uracil so as not to compete with DNA polymerases for thymine in primitive cells, should there be an evolutionary advantage to this in transcription (RNA synthesis) or translation (protein synthesis). From a chemical standpoint, examination might show that enzymatic efficiency of transcription is higher with uracil than it would be with thymine, and that enzymes that used uracil survived. This is not true for DNA, which is pretty stable and capable of employing thymine. This answer is from Michael Sturr, Ph. D. , Microbiologist and Science Educator, Mountainside, NJ

  • Views: 221

why is water an inorganic compound necessary for life
why is variable costing not allowed for gaap reporting
why is the sequence of bases in dna important
why use renewable energy instead of fossil fuels
why is economics called a study of scarcity and choice