Manuals and instructions for everything

why is there no proof of god

Propose that living beings are poorly designed. The argument from poor design states that if God is perfect, why did he create us and many other living creatures so poorly? For instance, we are vulnerable to many diseases, our bones break easily, and with age our bodies and minds break down. You could also mention our poorly-made spines, inflexible knees, and pelvic bones that make childbirth difficult and painful for women. Together, this biological evidence indicates that God does not exist (or that he did not create us well, in which case, there is no reason to worship him). Believers might counter this argument by stating that if God is perfect, then he created us as well as could possibly be expected. They might also argue that what we see as imperfections actually have a purpose in the larger workings of GodБs design. Point out the logical fallacy in this right away. We can't live our lives hoping that one day an explanation for why our eyes or shoulders were designed so poorly will arise.

Reference the philosopher Voltaire, who wrote a novel about people looking for meaning after a devastating earthquake hit Paris. We are pattern seeking animals, so naturally we look and hope for patterns where none can be found.
As might be expected, there was a huge outcry from religious leaders offering vigorous rebuttals to HawkingБs statement that God did not necessarily create the universe. Their arguments were weak, petty, and often showed little to no understanding of science. They even sometimes misquoted Hawking in order to set up straw men to knock down. The rebuttals boiled down to, БGod exists because I say so. Б The Arch Bishop of Canterbury, Dr. Rowan Williams, said БBelief in GodБis the belief that there is an intelligent, living agent on whose activity everything ultimately depends for its existence. Physics on its own will not settle the question of why there is something rather than nothing.

Б ( The Chief Rabbi of the United Kingdom, Lord Jonathan Sacks, said, БScience is about explanation. Religion is about interpretation. The Bible simply isn't interested in how the universe came into being. " Some said that Hawking did not disprove the existence of God, but this comes as no surprise. No one can prove or disprove the existence of an immaterial, invisible being. What Hawking did do is show how the universe could come into existence without a Prime Mover to set things into motion. Others said that you cannot get something from nothing and everything has to have a cause, with God being that cause. I donБt think these critics actually read HawkingБs book, because he explains these points. Thjere were some Christian publications which took aim at scientists themselves, claiming that God is merely the laws of the universe as physicists understand them. The Christian Post wrote : БHawkingБs redefinition of БnothingБ in no way removes God (and actually introduces us to something like God), but instead only reacquaints us with the standard debate between two eternal БsomethingsББthe uni/multiverse and God.

Б Some pointed out that string theory and M-theory are not accepted by all scientists. This is true, but that doesn't mean that Hawking is wrong. Many scientists do accept these cutting edge theories, and the fact that some do not does not disprove them. The methodology of science is based around postulation and experimentation. Finally, some tried to discredit Hawking by attacking his character rather than his work. For instance, Hawking has said life might exist on other planets, and that these "aliens" might be hostile to Earthlings. His antagonists retort that there is no proof of this, so everything Hawking says must be wrong. They try to conflate mere musings (that many other scientists have also speculated about) and his scientific work.

  • Views: 124

why do we have to go to church
why do we live only to die
why do some people support stem cell research
why i want to be a mechanical engineer essay
why does jesus love us so much
why do you pee when you cough
why do you believe what you believe