why do students drop out of university
The new university academic year will soon be upon us. Over half a million new hopeful students will begin what should be one of the most important experiences of their lives. Sadly, many of these students will drop out before the end of their first year. Research indicates that if you are the first in your family to go to university,
and social background, and have lower grades, then there is a higher chance you will of university. Critics say this to down to a. Universities, on the other hand, argue that students decide not to continue with their studies for a number of reasons Б such as financial issues, health problems or changes in family circumstances. To try and combat the number of students dropping out, institutions provide skills support programmes to help students transition from school to university, along with peer mentoring and counselling. But while these are all good ideas Б and can potentially benefit all students Б there is little evidence they do anything to reduce dropout rates. This is mainly because those students most in danger of dropping out are unlikely to use them. With all this in mind, there is an increasing recognition that the way they function. But up until now there has been little in the way of research on how these changes can be made for the better. This is what our focused on. Carried out over seven years, we looked at how changes in the university could improve student retention rates. And we identified a number of alterations universities can make to help students stay on beyond their first year to complete their studies. Rising numbers of students from more disadvantaged homes are dropping out of universities. One of the major findings in our research was the argument for dumping the traditional large lecture and replacing it with smaller two-hour seminars.
Our findings showed how the seminar system improves attendance and student performance Б especially for students with low entry qualifications. Students we spoke to said they liked the smaller seminar structure because they could interact easily with academics and each other. One student explained: I thought I would be sitting in a big lecture theatre with loads of other people, this is not like you see it on the telly and stuff, you know with loads of people listening to some professor dude, but itБs okay, itБs a lot like school and I like it because you can get to know people. The small group seminars also seem to particularly benefit students who live at home. This is because the classroom is where they spend most of their time while on campus and it allows them to develop a among their peers. And this then helps to reduce the likelihood of dropout. We also found that using Бstudent friendlyБ approachable academics to teach first years is another thing that can help. As can ensuring that the key tutor (year tutor) teaches all students. This can enable a strong relationship between students and academics to develop and allows tutors to more easily identify individuals having difficulties. Our research revealed the best indicator of students having problems is their attendance Б they simply stop going to classes. Knowing this, students who are missing lectures or seminars can then be approached sooner rather than later Б as early as the second week if needed. A sense of community is important for students. Pexels. We found this intervention is best made by the academic who has closest regular contact with the student.
The aim should be to help students make the right decision, not necessarily persuade them to stay. This is important because our research showed that when students were persuaded to stay, it almost always meant problems occurred later and the student left anyway Б just with increased debt. It is clear then that rather than just assuming the student is the problem, there is a lot universities could and should be doing to help with retention rates. And given that recent figures show the number of poor students dropping out of university is at the this is something that needs tackling sooner rather than later. t is, according to a, a problem that doesnБt shift: nearly 6% of university students drop out after their first year and, in 20 establishments, the figure is 10%. At the London Metropolitan University, the number rises to one in five (20%). Retention rates havenБt gone down since 2010, but they remain БstubbornБ, and very few institutions have made significant improvements, says the report. Of course, it is not the rate so much as the new situation since 2010 that makes the numbers so troubling: nowadays, a student who drops out after one year will emerge with unimproved prospects, certainly бе9,000 and possibly бе20,000 in debt. The standard line is that this is a failure by universities to adequately support their students. They tend to respond with an asinine rebuttal, of which this, from the University of Bedfordshire, is typical: БStudents may decide not to continue with their studies for a variety of reasons which include financial, academic, personal, health and family issues, so we provide a wide range of support services Б to ensure that our students thrive and achieve.
Б dropping out tend to be cast in the language of vulnerability, the validity of which is questionable. I had the inconvenient experience of actually asking a business studies student in Wirral South why he had dropped out. He described calculating the cost of each contact hour, and how much he learned from it that he couldnБt have found out on the internet: the more business he learned, the more he concluded that his business course made no business sense. Education cannot always be monetised; if we insist that it can, some perfectly reasonable students will be filled with a crushing and perfectly reasonable sense of futility. The London Met responded to the report a bit more trenchantly (many of the bottom 20 universities, including, and, didnБt respond). Its drop-out figures are inflated by the fact that it runs a lot of foundation courses, it says, which makes it appear that students havenБt completed when they have, in fact, just continued elsewhere. Fundamentally, it says, follow the money: БResearch by the National Union of Students in 2012 found that financial difficulty was studentsБ main reason for contemplating leaving their education. Many of our students do not have access to financial support beyond their student loans. To respond to this, last year we introduced бе3,000 cash bursaries for students who would have qualified for the state maintenance grant to provide extra support to students from low-income households. Б It is a problem that those in will no doubt recognise: withdrawal of funds causing crises that are then thrown back on to the institutions themselves, the resulting catastrophe then being used to illustrate that the public sector makes a mess of everything it touches.
- Views: 22
why do students dropout of university in their first year
why do students dropout of school essay
why do students dropout of high school essay
why do students dropout of college essay
why do students drop out of high school essay
why do students dropout of school essay
why do students dropout of college in their first year