why we should not pay college athletes
In the past couple of months, we have seen the world hate one family-- the Ball family, led by father LaVar. б
In the middle of last semester, LavarБs middle kid, LiAngelo, was set to play in China for the UCLA Bruins, and during his visit he was arrested and suspended from the team. At the same time, Lavar's youngest son, LaMelo was pulled out of school to be homeschooled. Although many question Lamelo's eligibility as a student-athlete due to the family company, Big Baller Brand, both sons are now playing off of America soil, in Lithuania. б The Ball family might have alternative motives for sending the kids to play in a foreign country, but questioning someoneБs eligibility over a family company is ridiculous. Here at Kentucky we see many basketball players coming in for just one year and going to the NBA, the one-and-done concept, but why is this rule composed by both the NBA and NCAA actually hurting the companies the most? Paying players in college has been seen as a harsh idea in college. б College players being paid shouldnБt be seen as a dismissive comment like it is today. Just recently in the University of Louisville versus University of Pittsburgh, Pitt Head Coach Kevin Stallings called out to a fan saying at least they didnБt pay their players $100,000 to play. This is the problem of what we see today. The NCAA makes a lot of money year in and year out. With the addition of the College Football Playoff, the NCAA now makes more money than ever with this system, and March Madness bringing in massive revenue to this Бnon-profit organization.
Б According to a pie chart from, 81 percent of its $871. 6 million dollar revenue in the 2012-13 season came from TV deals. This comes to roughly $705 million dollars alone in TV deals, which they wouldnБt have if it wasnБt for the athletes being on TV. Do the athletes see the money? Not really-- but they get a full scholarship, the other side of the argument would say. In 2015, said to that college players deserve to be paid. He gave an analogy of a musician who is going to college and can make money for their talents on the side. On the other hand, college athletes cannot be paid for their talents. Being a student-athlete is like a full-time job; even though it may seem relaxed, the student-athletes have a full course load of classes, plus practice, workouts, and games. By paying players, the quality of the product on the court or field might expand, as we might see top talent stay for two or three years as they know that money is coming through while working on a degree that they could fall back on in the future. Paying a few extra dollars couldБve helped people like Emmanuel Mudiay, who was a senior in high school, committed to Southern Methodist University, then decided to play overseas to keep money coming in for his family. The NBA does not say you have to attend college before entering the draft; it is all about the age. There are many theories on how they could pay players in the NCAA to make it fair in every sport for equal pay.
First, a committee would run the numbers and come up with a set value for every student-athlete. Allowing the hiring of agents and the branding of these players could be another source of revenue. This leads back to the Ball family and their company, Big Baller Brand. Currently, something like this is seen as being bad but could be here for the right reasons as we see future stars in every platform work on a degree while making what they deserve. Also, the final plus is how you are changing these players' lives. As they are making money, they are also learning how to take care of their money. We always hear the stories of the first purchases after that first paycheck comes in from the NBA and NFL and how crazy they blow their money. College is supposed to be for learning how to set a budget and save money; beginning to make money in college could help them learn to better manage their money. So the next time you see something negative about paying players, just imagine the teams the Cats couldБve had. John Wall, DeMarcus Cousins and Anthony Davis might have been on the same team. How about Karl-Anthony Towns, DeБAaron Fox and Malik Monk on the same team? Paying players should never be seen as negative, but should instead be glorified in America and in the NCAA. б Email. By Kevin Lennox For Logos Lite February 14, 2017 Itвs a quiet topic for now, but at some point between now and March, the debate of whether or not the NCAA should pay their student athletes will heat up again.
Itвs a debate that happens every year during the NCAA menвs basketball tournament as the schools competing in the tournament will make a lot of money from just being in the tournament. It is something that shouldnвt happen. Paying athletes will ruin college athletics because the bigger colleges and universities will have an unfair advantage over the smaller schools when it comes to recruiting players. There are many other reasons that show paying athletes is a bad idea, and here are a few reasons why. College athletes are already paid in the form of scholarships. They basically get four years or more, depending on redshirts and injuries, of tuition free living. В That is an average of $27,000 a year. If a school pays one athlete, then they have to pay all athletes, and colleges just canвt afford to pay every single athlete. Over all the divisions of NCAA athletics, there are over 450,000 athletes in all sports. To pay athletes, colleges would have to cut other sports teams or something along those lines to pay every athlete. College athletes may also be irresponsible with their money. If they get paid, it could lead to a violation of team or NCAA rules which could lead to even bigger issues. In the end, paying college athletes will cause more problems than it will solve; plus, universities and colleges could use that money to improve athletic facilities or even improve areas of need on campus.
- Views: 6
why does john calipari coach dominican republic
why do you use a set shot in volleyball
why do they call dennis rodman the worm
why do nba players wear sleeves on non shooting arm
why do nba players wear arm sleeves
why do nba players make so much money
why should college athletes not get paid