Manuals and instructions for everything

why school is bad for your health

We need to get kids out of the school buildings, and give them
a chance to learn about the world at first hand. It is a very
recent idea, and a crazy one, that the way to teach our young
people about the world they live in is to take them out of it and
shut them up in brick boxes. Aside from their parents, most
children never have any close contact with any adults except
people whose sole business is children. No wonder they have no
idea what adult life or work is like. A child learning to talk
does not learn by being corrected all the time - if corrected too
much, he will stop talking. He compares, a thousand times a day,
the difference between language as he uses it and as those around
him use it. Bit by bit, he makes the necessary changes to make his
language like other people's. In the same way, kids learning to do
all the other things they learn without adult teachers - to walk,
run, climb, whistle, ride a bike, skate, play games, jump rope -
compare their own performance with what more skilled people do,
and slowly make the needed changes. But in school we never give a
child a chance to detect his mistakes, let alone correct them. We
do it all for him. We act as if we thought he would never notice a
mistake unless it was pointed out to him, or correct it unless he
was made to. Soon he becomes dependent on the expert. We should
let him do it himself. Let him figure out what this word says,
what is the answer to that problem, whether this is a good way of
saying or doing this or that. Our job should be to help him when
he tells us that he can't find a way to get the right answer. Let's get rid of all this nonsense of grades, exams, marks. We
don't know now, and we never will know, how to measure what
another person knows or understands.

We certainly can't find out
by asking him questions. All we find out is what he doesn't know
which is what most tests are for, anyway. Throw it all out, and
let the child learn what every educated person must someday learn,
how to measure his own understanding, how to know what he knows or
does not know. People remember only what is interesting and useful to them,
what helps them make sense of the world, or helps them get along
in it. All else they quickly forget, if they ever learn it at all. The idea of a body of knowledge, to be picked up in
school and used for the rest of one' s life, is nonsense in a
world as complicated and rapidly changing as ours. Anyway, the
most important questions and problems of our time are not in the
curriculum, not even in the universities, let alone the schools. Children want, more than they want anything else, and even
after years of miseducation, to make sense of the world,
themselves, and other human beings. Let them get at this job, with
our help if they ask for it, in the way that makes most sense to
them. Excerpted from, CO: Sentient Publications, 2005. Reprinted with permission of Sentient Publications.
You might have thought that boys brought up in a single-sex environment would find relationships with girls difficult to handle. Now research due to be published tomorrow proves it. It shows that boys taught in singlesex schools are more likely to be divorced or separated from their partner than those who attended a mixed school by their early 40s. However, those who stayed together were just as likely to be happy in their relationship as men educated in mixed schools в when asked to rate the quality of their marriage on a scale of one to seven.

The findings, taken from studying a cohort of all those born in a single week of 1958, will be presented by Professor Diana Leonard, from London University's Institute of Education, at a conference at the Perse School for Girls in Cambridge. The research covered 17,000 adults who had been taught in a range of institutions from private boarding schools to state comprehensives. The majority had been brought up in day schools. Dr Leonard's findings have fuelled claims from teachers' leaders and education psychologists that boys brought up in a single-sex environment are less able to relate to the opposite sex than those taught in a co-educational school. Mary Bousted, general secretary of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers, said: "All the research shows single-sex schools are good for girls but bad for boys в both in terms of academic performance and socialisation. "Girls seem to learn what the nature of the beast is if they have been to single sex schools whereas boys taught on their own seem to find girls more puzzling. " Dr Bousted added: "Boys learn better when they are with girls and they actually learn to get on better. " The research also reveals that men taught in boys' schools are more likely to suffer from "a sense of malaise" or depression by their early 40s в possibly as a result of relationship breakdown. Men were also more likely to have spoken of a "dislike" for their school days if taught in a male-dominated environment. However, there was no difference in the likelihood of marital breakdown between girls brought up in single-sex schools and those taught in a mixed-sex environment.

The research also shows that boys from single-sex schools were just as likely to take part in household chores в such as cooking the evening meal, laundry, cleaning and shopping. "We found no link between single-sex schooling and the domestic division of labour," Professor Leonard will say. The research failed to back up a claim made by advocates of mixed schooling that being taught co-educationally meant youngsters were less likely to opt for a homosexual or lesbian lifestyle. "Only 21 men and 22 women reported living with same-sex partners at age 42," says the research. "We are therefore unable to comment on whether co-education did provide the 'clean, healthy, natural atmosphere' so commended by its early advocates. " Nearly half of those born in the 1958 week under study, who subsequently graduated from universities, had attended single-sex schools, the research also found. However, this was more likely to have been as a result of the type of schools they attended в there are more single private schools and grammar schools than comprehensives. Pupils taught in single-sex schools are more likely to study for subjects traditionally thought of as the preserve of the opposite sex, though. For instance, more girls choose to study maths and science in single-sex schools and more boys pick the arts and humanities than if they were taught in mixed classes. ""A central finding is that single-sex schooling moderates the effect of gender-stereotyping in terms of choice of field of study," says the research. "This runs counter to earlier assertions that co-education would widen subject choice. " More Education news:

  • Views: 1 375

why does my 6 year old talk like a baby
why do you like to go to school
why do u have to go to school
why do we need to discipline children
why do we have rules to live by
why should students be paid for good grades
why is effective communication important in developing positive relationships