why do you believe you will make a good barrister
"I see the Bar Standards Board are proposing an for prospective barristers," said TheCreep. "Do you think we need to introduce something similar for pupillage applications? "
"Yeah, right," said BusyBody. "As if a test could determine someone's future ability in court. " "Unless of course you could devise an objective test for charisma and charm," said OldSmoothie. "Sneakiness," said TheVamp. "Or an ability to twist the truth into whatever you want it to be," said Teflon. "As well as being able to bully your opponent into submission," said OldSmoothie "Or a judge for that matter," said UpTights. "I think the only reliable test is to pit the candidates against each other in a real life setting in which they have to use all their wits to knock out the competition," said HeadofChambers. "Over a prolonged period of time in which in order to win you really do have to prove yourself on every level," said BusyBody. "Where you can assess skills such as brown-nosing," said TheVamp looking at TheCreep "And back-stabbing," said BusyBody. "Learning to keep your mouth shut at the right time," said Teflon. "Not forgetting the all important photocopying skills," said UpTights. "In other words pupillage is the perfect aptitude test for being a barrister," said TheBusker. "And of course the most important thing of all in pupillage,"said OldRuin, "is making a decent cup of coffee. " "So in actual fact, all the Bar Standards Board should really be testing is coffee-making skills," said TheVamp. "Quite so," said OldSmoothie.
BabyBarista is a fictional account of a junior barrister written by whose new novel is. For more information and to read past posts visit. Cartoons by Alex Williams, author of. A prospective barrister explains how he felt when his mistake was highlighted first on Twitter and. I felt like beginning this article with a typo. After all, thatБs the reason why IБm writing it. Probably while stressing about upcoming exams, I happened to miss one when I proofread one of my pupillage applications. Schoolboy error though it was, I would never have known exactly why I didnБt acquire pupillage that year. Instead, thanks to Legal Cheek picking up a barristerБs recent series of tweets, I have a good idea of why at least one application seems not to have made the cut.
When I saw Legal Cheek, I noticed something familiar: a word-for-word quote of part of my application. It wasnБt the best way to start the week. Understandably, I felt embarrassed, even if everything was anonymous. But I was angry. I didnБt ever think that a pupillage committee member, someone who has gone through the process in the not so distant past, would ever be so crass as to lift a quote from an application form and hold it up to ridicule on Twitter. Before the inevitable chorus of sour grapes comes from the comments, let me explain. In principle, I have no problem with laughing at what I wrote. The offending article is quite a funny blooper. And we all laugh at bloopers associated with this process, such as the story of the interviewee who gets asked who he would most like to be stuck in a lift with and replies a lift engineer. Good little piecemeal bloopers like that are funny because theyБre usually harmless. If only the barrister in question had tweeted a piecemeal part of the blooper, though.
Instead, whole sentences from applications were reproduced. If I can identify my quote, who else can? Can other former candidates identify their quotes? What if they included an amended version of their blooper in their other applications? ThereБs a chance that their corrected sentence could be identified not only by the offending barrister but also by other pupillage committee members elsewhere. Instantly, some of the anonymity that should come with blind marking is lost. Instead of Applicant No173 they are now Бthat chap who had that typo of x when they meant y! Б Seeing a screenshot of their application online probably isnБt going to be the most constructive feedback either, trust me on that. (Although, that being said, itБs more feedback than most get when they get the rejection email. ) I honestly canБt believe that this barrister thought it was appropriate and sensible to do what he did. The Bar is, of course, different from other professions but would you expect a medium-sized solicitors firm to tweet screenshots of bloopers from their applicants? You can imagine the horror not only from HR but from marketing too.
Chambers want people dedicated not only to the profession but also to them, their region and their practice areas. Why should a great applicant apply to a chambers if some members openly mock their applications? A chambers shouldnБt be relying on the fact pupillages are scarce and the number of potential applicants is high. A pupil is an investment to each member of chambers who contributes money to the pot and chambers should be looking for the best investment from the entire pool, not just those who are bothered to apply. ItБs self-defeating to get a bad reputation amongst the future of your profession. By the time this article goes out, though, another weekend will have passed in which barristers will have had to forgo the sunny weather and review applications. Being honest, IБd be grumpy about it too. IБd moan about it to my nearest and dearest. IБd tell my colleagues about that applicant who had a typo, how it made me laugh but how it counted against him or her. IБd never even think about putting it up on Twitter though. Previously:
- Views: 16
why do you want to be a recruiter interview question
why do you need agility in badminton
why do we go for regression testing
why do we need to calibrate equipment
why read 20 minutes a day printable
why do you need to fast before blood work
why does a judge wear a wig